Mexico Doubles Down on Legal Opposition to US Gun Industry despite the U.S. Supreme Court’s unanimous rejection of the country’s $10 billion lawsuit against American gun manufacturers. Just days after the high court tossed out the case, Mexico’s newly elected President Claudia Sheinbaum made it clear that her administration will continue its legal crusade against U.S. firearm businesses.
“There is another pending lawsuit,” Sheinbaum stated during a press conference. “This one was against gun manufacturers. There is another lawsuit against gun distributors and gun stores. That is the one that we will be working with our legal team to move forward.”
Mexico originally sued U.S. gunmakers and distributors in 2021, alleging that American firearms companies were responsible for fueling cartel violence by allowing their products to be trafficked into the country. The lawsuit claimed damages of $10 billion and sought to hold gun companies like Glock, Colt, Beretta, and Smith & Wesson liable for violence occurring across the border.
But the Supreme Court decisively rejected the claim. In a 9-0 ruling, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that Mexico failed to provide any specific evidence linking the defendants to actual criminal activity. “It does not pinpoint, as most aiding-and-abetting claims do, any specific criminal transactions that the defendants (allegedly) assisted,” Kagan wrote.
Despite this legal defeat, Mexican officials continue to argue that American companies bear responsibility for the proliferation of illegal weapons. They claim that 70% of illegal firearms in Mexico originate from the United States—an estimate they’ve used to justify continued litigation.
The Supreme Court Upholds American Industry and the Second Amendment
The unanimous ruling in favor of U.S. gunmakers underscores how Mexico Doubles Down on Legal Opposition to US Gun Industry in the face of overwhelming legal precedent. Even the most liberal-leaning justices found no merit in Mexico’s claims, rejecting the idea that U.S. companies should be held liable for how their products are used illegally in a foreign country.
The court’s opinion also reinforced the protections afforded by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) of 2005. That law was specifically enacted to prevent frivolous lawsuits designed to bankrupt gun manufacturers by holding them responsible for criminal misuse of legally sold products.
Justice Kagan’s dismissal of Mexico’s argument included a rebuke of the narrative that AR-15s and AK-47s should be considered inherently dangerous “assault weapons.” This narrative, common among gun control advocates, was part of Mexico’s strategy to characterize American firearms as uniquely responsible for international violence. But the court found no basis to support that framing.
Smith & Wesson attorney Noel Francisco praised the ruling. “We are gratified that the Supreme Court agreed that we are not legally responsible for criminals misusing that product to hurt people, much less smuggling it to Mexico to be used by drug cartels,” he said.
Nonetheless, the 2022 lawsuit mentioned by Sheinbaum remains active. It targets not just manufacturers but also gun stores and distributors in an attempt to sidestep the precedent set by the Supreme Court. Critics argue this continued litigation is less about justice and more about political optics—a way for Mexico’s leadership to appear tough on crime while avoiding accountability for its own failed policies.
Mexico’s Strategy: Political Theater or Genuine Legal Fight?
The fact that Mexico Doubles Down on Legal Opposition to US Gun Industry is seen by many as a deflection from the country’s own internal issues. Mexico maintains some of the strictest gun control laws in the Western Hemisphere. Citizens face extreme restrictions on firearm ownership, and legal sales are funneled through a single government-run store. Despite these measures, cartel violence continues to rage—proving that gun bans do little to stop determined criminals.
Rather than addressing the corruption and systemic issues within its law enforcement and military structures, Mexico’s government is pursuing lawfare abroad. Meanwhile, the United States firearms industry maintains that it operates fully within the boundaries of American law and constitutional protections.
The Supreme Court’s ruling may have dealt a blow to Mexico’s first lawsuit, but the international legal battle is far from over. As Sheinbaum presses forward with the second case, American gun companies and Second Amendment advocates will once again rely on the Constitution—and the courts—to defend their rights.
There’s no better way to support the 2A than with merch that speaks before you do.
The Anti Anti-2A Social Club is more than a name it’s a stand against censorship, double standards, and the erosion of our rights. Every tee, hat, and mug is a symbol of unapologetic defiance. Wear it with pride because defending your rights is a badge of honor.
Click the link below to join the club.