The Appeals Court upholds injunction against California gun advertising prohibition, delivering a strong message that the First and Second Amendments are not to be trampled in the name of vague and overreaching laws. In a state known for pushing aggressive gun control measures, this particular law attempted to restrict how firearms and related products could be marketed—especially if the ads “reasonably appear to be attractive to minors.”
But California’s push to limit rights under the guise of protecting children was short-lived. The court made it clear: this law went too far.
Ninth Circuit Strikes Down the Ban
In a unanimous decision, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court’s injunction, effectively blocking California’s ban on advertisements for lawful firearm-related products. The state had argued that the restriction was necessary for public safety, but the court saw through the argument in Junior Sports Magazines v. Bonta.
The three-judge panel didn’t mince words. They emphasized that California failed to prove its law would directly and materially reduce gun violence among minors. While the state has a legitimate interest in protecting youth from harm, the Constitution doesn’t allow that interest to override the right to free speech.
“The First Amendment demands more than good intentions,” the court wrote. “It requires that the government demonstrate that its speech restrictions will truly alleviate the harms it alleges in a direct and material way.”
The court reaffirmed its earlier 2023 ruling on the same case, reinforcing that even public safety goals must be pursued within the boundaries of the Constitution.
Responsible Advertising Is Not a Crime
One of the core arguments in the court’s decision was that California already allows minors to use firearms in specific, lawful contexts—such as hunting and sports shooting—under adult supervision. If those activities are permitted, then truthful advertisements related to them cannot be arbitrarily banned.
The court stated: “California has many tools to address unlawful firearm use and violence among the state’s youth. But it cannot ban truthful ads about lawful firearm use among adults and minors unless it can show that such an intrusion into the First Amendment will significantly further the state’s interest.”
By targeting even responsible firearm-related ads that might “appear attractive to minors,” the law cast far too wide a net. It effectively criminalized education, tradition, and marketing that supports lawful activities. The judges noted this broad reach would suppress constitutionally protected speech, creating a chilling effect that could extend well beyond the gun industry.
This ruling not only upholds the rights of firearm companies to advertise, but also protects parents and youth who engage in traditional, lawful activities involving firearms.
A Win for the Constitution and Gun Culture
Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) founder Alan M. Gottlieb celebrated the ruling as a victory for constitutional freedoms. “This is great news,” he said. “Primarily this was a First Amendment case, but it also impacted the Second Amendment rights of adults and youth who participate in legitimate and constitutionally protected shooting sports.”
The broader implication is clear: the court will not allow governments to use children as political pawns to push through legislation that violates fundamental rights. California’s law, had it been upheld, would have set a dangerous precedent allowing any state to silence industries by targeting vague demographics.
The ruling now sets a precedent for all states within the 9th Circuit, which includes not just California, but also Alaska, Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington.
While California may attempt to rework or reframe similar laws in the future, this decision signals that any effort to censor lawful speech—especially when it relates to constitutionally protected activity—will face heavy scrutiny.
Ultimately, this is a victory not just for the firearms community, but for anyone who values the First Amendment and the preservation of American freedoms.
There’s no better way to support the 2A than with merch that speaks before you do.
The Anti Anti-2A Social Club is more than a name it’s a stand against censorship, double standards, and the erosion of our rights. Every tee, hat, and mug is a symbol of unapologetic defiance. Wear it with pride because defending your rights is a badge of honor.
Click the link below to join the club.