Court rules cops can’t stop-and-frisk you for carrying a gun — a federal court just confirmed what gun rights advocates have been saying for years: you cannot detain someone simply because they might be armed. Not for acting suspicious. Not for breaking a law. Just for exercising a constitutional right.
Until now, that’s exactly what some cities — and even federal officers — have been doing. Take the case of Damion Wilson. In Louisiana, a deputy U.S. marshal stopped him after noticing what looked like a “bulge” in his waistband. No warrant. No observed crime. Just the suspicion he might be carrying a firearm.
Owning a Gun Is a Right, Not a Reason for Suspicion
The Second Amendment isn’t a privilege handed out when convenient — it’s a right. With constitutional carry and permitless carry now law in over half the states, law-abiding citizens should never be treated as criminals simply for being armed.
Judge Andy Oldham of the Fifth Circuit made it clear:
“The mere fact that a citizen carries a firearm does not create reasonable suspicion that he committed a crime.”
It’s common sense — and the same principle applies to any constitutional right. You wouldn’t stop someone because they might be going to church or speaking out against the government. Carrying a gun legally shouldn’t be treated any differently.
A Landmark Case With National Implications
The case, United States v. Wilson, challenges the idea that exercising a right creates probable cause for a stop. The Fifth Circuit rejected that logic outright, ruling that suspicion of legal firearm possession isn’t enough to detain someone.
Judge Oldham compared it to driving:
“Based solely on the observation that someone is driving a car, does an officer have reasonable suspicion that the driver is unlicensed? Obviously, no.”
If upheld, this ruling could set a national precedent, giving gun owners in every state stronger protections against unconstitutional searches and seizures.
The Danger of Suspicion-Based Policing
If suspicion becomes enough to justify a stop, it quickly becomes standard — and that’s where profiling thrives. Not just racial profiling, but targeting based on clothing, gear, or demeanor.
Courts have already allowed stops for “acting nervous,” “looking over a shoulder,” or “being in a high-crime area.” Those vague justifications put every law-abiding gun owner at risk.
The government doesn’t get to assume you’re a criminal just because you might be armed. That’s not policing — that’s pre-crime. And it has no place in a free country.
Rights are meaningless if you have to risk harassment to exercise them. This ruling is a reminder: the Constitution isn’t a suggestion, and it applies in the real world — not just on paper.
Stay sharp. Stay informed. Stay armed.
There’s no better way to support the 2A than with merch that speaks before you do.
The Anti Anti-2A Social Club is more than a name it’s a stand against censorship, double standards, and the erosion of our rights. Every tee, hat, and mug is a symbol of unapologetic defiance. Wear it with pride because defending your rights is a badge of honor.
Click the link below to join the club.