Federal Judge Upholds Colorado’s Age-Based Gun Control in a recent decision that has stirred debate across the nation about whether 18 to 20-year-olds are being unfairly denied their constitutional rights. Last week, Chief U.S. District Judge Philip A. Brimmer ruled against a legal challenge brought by Rocky Mountain Gun Owners and two private citizens who argued that Colorado’s age restriction on firearm purchases violates the Second Amendment.
The plaintiffs asserted that all law-abiding adults—including those aged 18 to 20—should be included within the protections of “the People” as defined in the Constitution. Their argument emphasized that age alone should not disqualify someone from exercising a fundamental right, particularly the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.
But Judge Brimmer ultimately sided with the state and referenced a prior decision by the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which found that the Second Amendment does not necessarily apply to every adult under all circumstances. Brimmer ruled that the age-based restriction falls under a “safe harbor” doctrine, meaning it is “presumptively lawful” and thus exempt from further constitutional scrutiny.
Judicial Disagreement Highlights the Need for Supreme Court Intervention
The fact that Federal Judge Upholds Colorado’s Age-Based Gun Control stands in stark contrast to rulings from other federal courts highlights a growing legal conflict across the United States. While the 10th Circuit considers age-based restrictions constitutional, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals—which governs Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi—recently struck down similar federal restrictions, ruling in favor of expanding rights to 18- to 20-year-olds.
This judicial inconsistency creates confusion not only for gun owners and potential buyers, but also for state lawmakers and law enforcement. It also sets the stage for a potential showdown at the U.S. Supreme Court, which may be forced to weigh in on whether age-based gun laws are compatible with the Constitution.
Judge Brimmer’s acknowledgment that the plaintiffs—Adrian Pineda and Matthew Newkirk—are indeed part of “the People” protected by the Second Amendment makes the ruling all the more complex. Although he recognized their constitutional standing, he still relied on precedent to argue that the age restriction falls outside the scope of judicial review.
This narrow interpretation of rights is cause for concern among gun rights advocates, who argue that fundamental freedoms should not be subject to carveouts based on arbitrary classifications like age. They assert that if an 18-year-old can vote, serve in the military, and be held legally accountable as an adult, they should also have the right to protect themselves with a legally purchased firearm.
What This Means for the Second Amendment and Young Americans
The decision that Federal Judge Upholds Colorado’s Age-Based Gun Control could have long-term implications for both state and federal gun policy. More progressive-leaning states may feel emboldened to pass similar laws that limit access to firearms for certain age groups under the guise of public safety, despite growing evidence that such laws have little to no impact on crime rates.
Gun rights organizations are already mobilizing in response to this ruling. Many have called on the U.S. Supreme Court to step in and provide a unified, national interpretation of the Second Amendment that clearly defines who is entitled to its protections. Without such clarity, lower courts will continue to deliver conflicting decisions, and law-abiding citizens—especially young adults—will bear the consequences.
At a time when personal safety concerns are rising nationwide, limiting responsible adults from accessing legal means of self-defense is viewed by many as both unconstitutional and counterproductive. As the legal battle continues, now is a critical moment for supporters of the Second Amendment to contact their legislators and advocate for consistent, nationwide protection of individual gun rights—regardless of age.
There’s no better way to support the 2A than with merch that speaks before you do.
The Anti Anti-2A Social Club is more than a name it’s a stand against censorship, double standards, and the erosion of our rights. Every tee, hat, and mug is a symbol of unapologetic defiance. Wear it with pride because defending your rights is a badge of honor.
Click the link below to join the club.