Missouri AG Warns Big Tech Over Censoring Second Amendment-Related Content is making headlines across the nation as Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey takes a strong stand in defense of constitutional rights. In a bold move this week, Bailey warned major social media corporations that censorship targeting firearm-related speech and commerce will not be tolerated—especially when it interferes with the rights protected under the Second Amendment.
The First and Second Amendments Are Inseparable
In a press release that pulled no punches, Bailey reminded the public—and Big Tech—that the right to keep and bear arms is not a fringe issue, but a foundational freedom. “The right to keep and bear arms is the cornerstone of every other constitutional freedom,” Bailey declared. “If tech giants are colluding to silence lawful expression about firearms or shut down commerce protected under the Second Amendment, Missourians deserve to know.”
The Missouri AG emphasized a critical point that resonates with many constitutional scholars and gun rights advocates: the First and Second Amendments are deeply intertwined. The ability to speak openly about one’s rights and defend those rights with lawful arms are not two separate fights—they are one and the same.
Bailey’s office is stepping forward where many believe federal authorities have failed. His message is clear: digital platforms should not be used to selectively stifle lawful conversations about firearms. Whether the suppression is through algorithmic bias, shadow banning, or content takedowns, the impact is the same—silencing lawful American voices.
Launching a Formal Investigation Into Big Tech Practices
Backing his words with real action, Bailey issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to several of the biggest players in the tech world: Google, YouTube, Facebook, and Instagram. The goal? To obtain transparency and uncover whether these companies are actively suppressing Second Amendment-related content or engaging in politically motivated censorship.
Bailey stated plainly, “When Big Tech companies hold the power to control what Americans see, say, and believe, they hold the power to reshape the nation. We will not allow Silicon Valley to rewrite the Bill of Rights from behind a firewall.”
His investigation is not just symbolic. It represents a legal and constitutional challenge to corporations who may be overstepping their role as platforms and entering the realm of ideological gatekeepers. In today’s digital age, where the majority of communication and commerce occurs online, the implications of such censorship are significant and far-reaching.
Gun Rights Advocates Applaud the Bold Move
For years, firearm enthusiasts, retailers, and constitutional advocates have expressed concern about content suppression. From social media influencers having their accounts shadow banned, to gun stores having ads blocked or removed, there’s a growing body of anecdotal evidence that suggests tech platforms are not playing fair when it comes to Second Amendment content.
Bailey’s move to investigate and potentially hold these companies accountable is being hailed as a much-needed course correction. It signals to the rest of the nation that state leaders are willing to stand up and protect all parts of the Constitution—not just the ones that align with corporate interests or political trends.
Gun rights groups and free speech advocates alike see this as a turning point. If successful, the investigation could set a legal precedent and inspire other states to follow Missouri’s lead. It may also force Big Tech to reconsider the ways in which they moderate and restrict lawful content—especially when it concerns constitutionally protected topics.
In a time when censorship, digital control, and political overreach are at the forefront of public debate, Missouri’s bold stance sends a powerful message: no company is above the Constitution. And when it comes to protecting the right to keep and bear arms, the battle for freedom isn’t just at the ballot box—it’s online, too.
There’s no better way to support the 2A than with merch that speaks before you do.
The Anti Anti-2A Social Club is more than a name it’s a stand against censorship, double standards, and the erosion of our rights. Every tee, hat, and mug is a symbol of unapologetic defiance. Wear it with pride because defending your rights is a badge of honor.
Click the link below to join the club.