Supreme Court Blocks Mexican Government’s Lawsuit Against US Gunmakers in a powerful 9-0 decision that reaffirms long-standing protections for the American firearms industry. The unanimous ruling, delivered Thursday, dealt a decisive blow to an unprecedented attempt by the Mexican government to hold U.S. gun manufacturers liable for cartel violence south of the border.
At the heart of the case was Mexico’s $10 billion lawsuit against seven U.S. gunmakers, including Smith & Wesson, in Smith & Wesson Brands v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Mexico alleged that American firearms companies knowingly fueled violence in their country by supplying weapons that ultimately ended up in the hands of drug cartels. However, the Supreme Court ruled that such claims are barred under the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA)—a 2005 federal law passed to prevent exactly this kind of litigation.
Justices Agree: Foreign Powers Cannot Undermine U.S. Law
The justices, across ideological lines, recognized the danger of allowing a foreign government to interfere in a constitutionally protected industry. Even Justice Elena Kagan, who has historically sided with gun control advocates, delivered the opinion for the unanimous court, stating that the lawsuit fails under PLCAA’s clear legal standards.
“The kinds of allegations Mexico makes cannot satisfy the demands of the statute’s predicate exception,” Kagan wrote. “Mexico’s complaint, for the reasons given, does not plausibly allege such aiding and abetting. So, this suit remains subject to PLCAA’s general bar: An action cannot be brought against a manufacturer if, like Mexico’s, it is founded on a third party’s criminal use of the company’s product.”
The PLCAA was enacted to prevent lawsuits that blame gunmakers for criminal misuse of firearms by third parties. Congress passed the law in response to a growing trend of legal challenges intended not to address wrongdoing, but to bankrupt firearm manufacturers through constant litigation. According to the court’s opinion, Mexico’s suit falls squarely into this category.
“Recall that Congress enacted the statute to halt a flurry of lawsuits attempting to make gun manufacturers pay for the downstream harms resulting from misuse of their products,” the court explained. “Congress explained that PLCAA was meant to stop these suits—to prevent manufacturers (and sellers) from being held ‘liable for the harm caused by those who criminally or unlawfully misuse firearm[s].’”
A Victory for Gun Rights and American Industry
Gun rights advocates and industry leaders applauded the decision. The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), a leading trade association for the firearms industry, called the ruling a “tremendous victory.”
“For too long, gun control activists have attempted to twist basic tort law to malign the highly regulated U.S. firearm industry with the criminal acts of violent organized crime, both here in the United States and abroad,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF Senior Vice President and General Counsel. “The firearm industry is sympathetic to the plight of those in Mexico who are victims of rampant and uncontrolled violence at the hands of narco-terrorist drug cartels, but blaming U.S. companies for that violence is both unjust and unfounded.”
Keane emphasized that there is zero evidence that American gunmakers have directly contributed to Mexico’s cartel problem. Rather, guns are often smuggled illegally across the border after they’ve been lawfully manufactured and sold in the U.S. Attempting to hold manufacturers liable after the fact, critics argue, would set a dangerous precedent—one that could be extended to countless industries and products misused abroad.
Thursday’s decision is a strong signal from the high court that, while gun cases often spark fierce debate, the foundational protections for lawful American businesses remain intact. It is also a reminder that the Second Amendment means little without the survival of the industry that supplies constitutionally protected firearms.
With this ruling, the Supreme Court has drawn a clear line: U.S. manufacturers cannot be held responsible for international criminal conduct they neither condone nor control.
There’s no better way to support the 2A than with merch that speaks before you do.
The Anti Anti-2A Social Club is more than a name it’s a stand against censorship, double standards, and the erosion of our rights. Every tee, hat, and mug is a symbol of unapologetic defiance. Wear it with pride because defending your rights is a badge of honor.
Click the link below to join the club.