I thought the Gay and Tom Ford analogy in my last video was pretty clear. If Starbucks came out with a policy for Gay people like they did for Gun owners, Gay people would consider that stance Anti-Gay. Therefore, how can Starbucks come out with the stance they did for gun owners and that not be Anti-Gun?
Let’s keep in mind, when the Gay rights movement said the movement was the same as the Civil Rights movement, there was backlash from Blacks who felt there was no comparison. In turn the Gay rights movement felt insulted and were up in arms (pun intended). Now, parts of the Gay Rights Movement feel there is no comparison between the Gay Rights movement and the Gun Rights movement.
Explain Irony.
For the Record, Tuscan Leather from Tom Fords Signature Line is the Sh*t, especially when you pair it with his Tobacco Vanille scent. What? I can’t love AR-15’s and arguably overpriced cologne at the same time? lol.
Below, are the Links to the Huffington Post Article and The New Civil Rights Article.
Colion Noir, NRA Commentator, Slams Starbucks ‘Anti-Gun Stance’ Using Gay Comparison
